Nike SB FT Dunk Low Pro Premium FT SB SB QS Blk White Midnight Blue Size 12 aa5e89

Nike SB FT Dunk Low Pro Premium FT SB SB QS Blk White Midnight Blue Size 12 aa5e89

Item specifics

Condition:
: An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ... Read moreabout the condition
Color:

Multi-Color

Material: Leather Brand:

Nike

Pattern: Solid US Shoe Size (Men's): 12
Features: Slip Resistant Product Line: Nike Air
Country/Region of Manufacture: Vietnam Style: Athletic Sneakers
Model:

Nike SB Dunk

Width: Wide (E,W)
This is a cropped closeup of a senior couple enjoying a game of chess

Nike SB FT Dunk Low Pro Premium FT SB SB QS Blk White Midnight Blue Size 12 aa5e89

Women’s cognitive functioning past middle age may be affected by the degree of gender equality in the country they live in, according to new findings from Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

“This research is a first attempt to shed light on important, but understudied, adverse consequences of gender inequality on women’s health in later life,” explains researcher Eric Bonsang of University Paris-Dauphine and Columbia University, lead author on the study. “It shows that women living in gender-equal countries have better cognitive test scores later in life than women living in gender-unequal societies. Moreover, in countries that became more gender-equal over time, women’s cognitive performance improved relative to men’s.”

Bonsang and colleagues Vegard Skirbekk (Norwegian Institute of Public Health and Columbia University) and Ursula Staudinger (Columbia University) had noticed that the differences in men’s and women’s scores on cognitive tests varied widely across countries. In countries in Northern Europe, for example, women tend to outperform men on memory tests, while the opposite seems to be true in several Southern European countries.

“This observation triggered our curiosity to try to understand what could cause such variations across countries,” says Bonsang.

While economic and socioeconomic factors likely play an important role, Bonsang, Skirbekk, and Staudinger wondered whether sociocultural factors such as attitudes about gender roles might also contribute to the variation in gender differences in cognitive performance around the globe. They hypothesized that women who live in a society with more traditional attitudes about gender roles would likely have less access to opportunities for education and employment and would, therefore, show lower cognitive performance later in life compared with men of the same age.

The researchers analyzed cognitive performance data for participants between the ages of 50 and 93, drawn from multiple nationally representative surveys including the US Health and Retirement Study; the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe; the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing; and the World Health Organization Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health. Together, the surveys provided data for a total of 27 countries.

All of the surveys include an episodic memory task to measure cognitive performance. Participants heard a list of 10 words and were asked to recall as many as they could immediately; in some of the surveys, participants again recalled as many words as they could after a delay. Additionally, some of the surveys included a task intended to assess executive function in which participants named as many animals as they could within 1 minute.

To gauge gender-role attitudes, the researchers focused on participants’ self-reported agreement with the statement, “When jobs are scarce, men should have more right to a job than women.”

Overall, the data showed considerable variability in gender differences in cognitive performance across countries. In some countries, women outperformed men—the female advantage in cognitive performance was highest in Sweden. In other countries, however, men outperformed women—the male advantage was highest in Ghana.

As the researchers hypothesized, increasingly traditional gender-role attitudes were linked with decreasing cognitive performance among women across countries. In other words, women in countries with less traditional attitudes were likely to have better cognitive performance later in life relative to women in more traditional countries.

Bonsang and colleagues noted that changes in gender-role attitudes within a country over time were associated with changes in women’s cognitive performance relative to men.

Although the data are correlational in nature, several more detailed analyses point toward a causal relationship. These analyses suggest that gender-role attitudes may play a notable role in important outcomes for women across different countries, the researchers argue.

“These findings reinforce the need for policies aiming at reducing gender inequalities as we show that consequences go beyond the labor market and income inequalities,” says Bonsang. “It also shows how important it is to consider seemingly intangible influences, such as cultural attitudes and values, when trying to understand cognitive aging.”

“In future work, we plan to disentangle the effect of gender-role attitudes on gender difference in cognition—via the impacts of those attitudes on institutions, politics and labor market characteristics—from the impact of beliefs of women associated with gender-role attitudes,” Bonsang says.

We use data from Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Release 2.6.0, English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) Release 19, the RAND Corporation Health and Retirement Study (HRS) Version N, and Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE) Wave 1. The SHARE project has been primarily funded by the European Commission (see http://www.share-project.org for the full list of funders). The ELSA project has been funded by a consortium of U.K. government departments and the U.S. National Institute on Aging (see http://www.elsa-project.ac.uk/funders for the full list of funders). The HRS project is funded by the Social Security Administration and the U.S. National Institute on Aging


Published July 31, 2017
NIKE DUNK CMFT WB.. MULTI-COLOR.. SIZE 10.. SHIPS FAST!,NIKE PG 2 PALMDALE ALL STAR CLAY GREEN SZ 11.5 NO BOXNike Alpha Menace Elite Football Cleats Black White (871519-010) Men's Size 11.5,NIKE AIR MAX 90 LTR PREMIUM BLK/GRANITE ANTHRICITE/CRIMSON SIZE 10.5NIKE JORDAN ULTRA FLY 2 LOW UK SIZE 7 *AH8110-010*,Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 34 FlyEase, Men Sizes 9-14 Extra Wide Grey/White/Blue NEW!,Men's Nike Air Max Big Swoosh Charles Barkley Gary Payton Size 11,NIKE QUEST NAVY SHOES SIZE US 8.5 STREET CASUAL AA7403 400,Nike Zoom KD10 Mens Size 11 Basketball Shoes Multicolor,Nike Air Jordan 10 Retro “Statue Of Liberty”,Nike Air Max Speed Turf Mens Style : 525225-011 Black/White Size 9.5*New Mens Nike Alpha Menace Elite Football Cleats Black/White Retail $200,Nike Basketball Kobe 11 EM Draft Day Size 9,NIKE AIR MAX SEQUENT 2 / PARAMOUNT BLUE - BLACK - VOLT / MEN'S SIZE 14Nike classic Cortez premium nylon black white,ADIDAS A.T 360.2 PRIMA WOMENS SHOES BLACK/WHITE/GREY SIZE 7.5,Huarache Free Run Sz 9 WLF GRY/WLF GRY GRY ACTION GRN 510801 003,Nike Free RN Flyknit 2017 men running run Sz-14-15 dark green 880843-300Nike Air Max2 CB 94 Low Charles Barkley Light Bone Bordeaux Men Shoes 917752-004,NIKE Revolution 4 Running Shoe - Men's Size 12W Black/WhiteNike Lebron XIV 15 Men's Size 10 US 852405-007 SilverNIKE SB ZOOM DUNK HIGH PRO SiZE 12 OBSIDIAN/WHITE/INDUSTRIAL BLUE 854851-414,Nike Zoom Mercurial XI Flyknit white/wolf Grey 844626-100 Men's size 10.5,adidas Originals Wmns Prophere Women New Clear Mint Lifestyle Sneakers AQ1138,nike free SB mens trainers 704936 046 sneakers shoes,Nike Lupinek Flyknit Cargo Khaki Green Sequoia Sneaker Boots 862505-300 Men's 11,Nike LF1 Duckboot Low Us12.5 Eur47 Af1 Air Force One Lunar 1 Lv8 07Nike Hypervenom Phatal III DF FG Soccer Mens Shoes Laser Orange 852554-801 sz 12,NIKE HYPERDUNK 2017 LOW LIMITED SZ 11 LIGHT BONE WHITE GUM 897636-901NEW Nike Nike Lunar TR1 - Black Running, Cross Training (Men's Multiple Sizes),