New Shoe, Balance Womens WW411WT2 Walking Shoe, New White, 8 2A US 22800e

New Shoe, Balance Womens WW411WT2 Walking Shoe, New White, 8 2A US 22800e

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
UPC: 0889516077030
Size: 8 2A(N) US Brand: New Balance
Style: sport Model: WW411V2 Walking Shoe-W
US Shoe Size (Women's): 8 MPN: WW411V2 Walking Shoe-W
Size Type: Regular Color: White
Material Type: Leather EAN: 0889516077030
This is a cropped closeup of a senior couple enjoying a game of chess

New Shoe, Balance Womens WW411WT2 Walking Shoe, New White, 8 2A US 22800e

Women’s cognitive functioning past middle age may be affected by the degree of gender equality in the country they live in, according to new findings from Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

“This research is a first attempt to shed light on important, but understudied, adverse consequences of gender inequality on women’s health in later life,” explains researcher Eric Bonsang of University Paris-Dauphine and Columbia University, lead author on the study. “It shows that women living in gender-equal countries have better cognitive test scores later in life than women living in gender-unequal societies. Moreover, in countries that became more gender-equal over time, women’s cognitive performance improved relative to men’s.”

Bonsang and colleagues Vegard Skirbekk (Norwegian Institute of Public Health and Columbia University) and Ursula Staudinger (Columbia University) had noticed that the differences in men’s and women’s scores on cognitive tests varied widely across countries. In countries in Northern Europe, for example, women tend to outperform men on memory tests, while the opposite seems to be true in several Southern European countries.

“This observation triggered our curiosity to try to understand what could cause such variations across countries,” says Bonsang.

While economic and socioeconomic factors likely play an important role, Bonsang, Skirbekk, and Staudinger wondered whether sociocultural factors such as attitudes about gender roles might also contribute to the variation in gender differences in cognitive performance around the globe. They hypothesized that women who live in a society with more traditional attitudes about gender roles would likely have less access to opportunities for education and employment and would, therefore, show lower cognitive performance later in life compared with men of the same age.

The researchers analyzed cognitive performance data for participants between the ages of 50 and 93, drawn from multiple nationally representative surveys including the US Health and Retirement Study; the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe; the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing; and the World Health Organization Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health. Together, the surveys provided data for a total of 27 countries.

All of the surveys include an episodic memory task to measure cognitive performance. Participants heard a list of 10 words and were asked to recall as many as they could immediately; in some of the surveys, participants again recalled as many words as they could after a delay. Additionally, some of the surveys included a task intended to assess executive function in which participants named as many animals as they could within 1 minute.

To gauge gender-role attitudes, the researchers focused on participants’ self-reported agreement with the statement, “When jobs are scarce, men should have more right to a job than women.”

Overall, the data showed considerable variability in gender differences in cognitive performance across countries. In some countries, women outperformed men—the female advantage in cognitive performance was highest in Sweden. In other countries, however, men outperformed women—the male advantage was highest in Ghana.

As the researchers hypothesized, increasingly traditional gender-role attitudes were linked with decreasing cognitive performance among women across countries. In other words, women in countries with less traditional attitudes were likely to have better cognitive performance later in life relative to women in more traditional countries.

Bonsang and colleagues noted that changes in gender-role attitudes within a country over time were associated with changes in women’s cognitive performance relative to men.

Although the data are correlational in nature, several more detailed analyses point toward a causal relationship. These analyses suggest that gender-role attitudes may play a notable role in important outcomes for women across different countries, the researchers argue.

“These findings reinforce the need for policies aiming at reducing gender inequalities as we show that consequences go beyond the labor market and income inequalities,” says Bonsang. “It also shows how important it is to consider seemingly intangible influences, such as cultural attitudes and values, when trying to understand cognitive aging.”

“In future work, we plan to disentangle the effect of gender-role attitudes on gender difference in cognition—via the impacts of those attitudes on institutions, politics and labor market characteristics—from the impact of beliefs of women associated with gender-role attitudes,” Bonsang says.

We use data from Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Release 2.6.0, English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) Release 19, the RAND Corporation Health and Retirement Study (HRS) Version N, and Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE) Wave 1. The SHARE project has been primarily funded by the European Commission (see http://www.share-project.org for the full list of funders). The ELSA project has been funded by a consortium of U.K. government departments and the U.S. National Institute on Aging (see http://www.elsa-project.ac.uk/funders for the full list of funders). The HRS project is funded by the Social Security Administration and the U.S. National Institute on Aging


Published July 31, 2017
NIKE WOMENS AIR HUARACHE RUN PREMIUM SZ 6.5 METALLIC MAHOGANY WHITE AA0523 202,etnies Women's Jameson 2 Skate Shoe Tan 11 M US,Charles by Charles David Women's Keenan Ankle-Strap Sandal Camel Suede Sandals,New Balance Women's W670 Ankle-High Running Shoe,Rockport Women's Trustride W Tie Fashion Sneaker, Black, 10 M US,Skechers 14480 Performance Womens Go Step Lite-Lily Walking Shoe,New FILA Ray Shoes Disruptor Athletic Running Women Black Green Red FS1SIA3110X,Naturalizer Women's Veda Wedge Sandal Cognac Leather,Adidas Originals Iniki Runner BY9092 I-5923 White/Tactile Green Women US 5.5,Superga Women's 2750 Cotu Classic Navy 42 M EU,NEW NIKE WMNS AIR FORCE 1 HI FW QS NYC LIGHT BONE 704010-001 NEW SIZE 7.5,New Balance WZANTHL3 D Wide Purple Women Running Shoes Trainers WZANTHL3D,Shoes Lotto Leggenda Tokyo Shibuya W R4211 Women's Run Vintage White Grey LTDWomen's Nike Juvenate Low Running Sneakers size 8,Nike Womens Zoom All Out Flyknit Hot Punch Pink Black Running Shoes Size 8.5New Balance WXC5000R Womens 5000v3 Track-Shoes, Dark Mulberry/Alpha Pink, 5.5 B,NIKE WOMEN'S AIR FORCE 1 '07 LX SHOES SIZE 6.5 black 898889 009,Women's New Balance Fresh Foam 1080v8 W1080BW8 Running Shoes Black White D-Wide,Skechers Women's Go Walk Outdoors-runyon Sport Sandal,VINCE Blair Oxblood Red Velvet Slip On Skater Sneakers Size 9.5,NIKE WOMENS HUARACHE RUN ULTRA SE SZ 5.5 DARK LODEN GOLD LEAF 859516 300,New Womens Nike Air Max 2016 806772 500 sz 7 Purple Black Orange Sneakers,Nike Zoom Rival XC Women's Bright Citron/Bright Crimson/Dark Citron 04717706Nike Free RN Flyknit Women's Running Shoe 831070 404 Size 8Kenneth Cole New York Women's Kenmare Slip-On Sneaker,Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 34 Shield Black/Black-Black-Obsidian 907328-001,NIKE Women's Wmns Lunar Exceed TR, Black/WhiiteSkechers Sport D 'Lites-Now & Then Women Sneaker Black - Choose SZ/Color,NEW NIKE Air Zoom Pegasus 34 Running Shoe White/Bronze Sz 7Jambu Women's JBU Pristine Slingback Grey Microsuede Walking Shoes